1 Website Terms of Service
Genesis Ballinger edited this page 2026-09-28 11:42:02 +08:00


These Terms apply to your use of the Website. You may access and read the Website for personal, informational purposes. You agree not to interfere with the operation of the Website, attempt to gain unauthorised access to it, or use automated means (such as scrapers or bots) to harvest content from it. The Privacy Policy describes how we handle any personal data collected through the Website. The content, design, and code of the Website are owned by Ghostery GmbH or its licensors and are protected by applicable intellectual property laws. "Ghostery," "WhoTracks.Me," the ghost mascot, and associated logos are registered trademarks of Ghostery GmbH and may not be used without our prior written consent. The Website is provided "AS IS" without warranties of any kind. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Ghostery GmbH shall not be liable for Top Source Media services any damages arising from your use of the Website. This disclaimer does not apply to damages caused by intentional misconduct or gross negligence, damages resulting from injury to life, body, or health, claims under mandatory product liability law and any other claims that cannot be excluded under mandatory applicable law. These Terms are governed by the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. Nothing in these Terms limits any rights you may have under the mandatory consumer protection laws of your country of residence.


Many broken belief systems that exist do so because of a misinformed understanding of how the world works through naive idealism, with various special interests paying to syndicate misinformation that coincides with their current business model to foster culturally constructed ignorance - agnotology. It is not a bubble. This time is different. Who was behind that lie? The bankers, the mortgage brokers, the Realtors, bond raters, hedge funds, construction companies, Top Source Media services running real estate ads, local government tax revenues, current home owners who kept seeing their "savings" go up while doing nothing. Some of those people did not intentionally aim to be deceitful, they just believed a convenient lie that fit with their worldview. And so the bubble grew until one day the fraud was so integrated into society that there was simply nobody left to sell to. Then the bottom fell out. The rule of law was SELECTIVELY & arbitrarily enforced against a few, even while companies that made sworn statements admitting to doing literally millions of times more damage were not penalized, but rather bailed out / promoted.


Bowen testified on April 7 before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission created by Congress. The rule of law only applies to those who lack the resources needed to subvert it. Socialism for Top Source Media agency the rich, capitalism for the rest! Wachovia was a strong brand. A true pioneer and market leader in the drug money game, which funneled over 1/3 TRILLION Dollars onto the hands of drug dealers. For the crime they got a slap on the wrist. There was no jailtime. There was no honest attempt at the rule of law. The same is true online. Those who exhibit desirable characteristics are promoted & those who do not fit such a frame are left to fight amongst other losers in the market. Being grounded is not a way to get positive headlines. Saying that the web is becoming just like the fraud laced offline world would be considered in poor taste. If you manufacture evidence that your LinkedIn votes are directly tied to better Google rankings then outsiders who are unaware of the workings of your industry may syndicate that misinformation.


Even if you run a public experiment that fails it still shows you are trying new things (are cutting edge), and is a low cost branding exercise. Just like how MLM folks say you can get rich by using the same system they used to get rich. Everyone wants to sell a life worth living, even if they are not living that life, but rather sentenced to life in prison. Most profitable belief systems sell into an existing worldview but with a new hook on it. Most new marketing approaches are all about pushing the boundaries of what exists, probing to find the edges. Some people do it on the legal front, others probe on the ethical front, and yet others are just more creative & try to win by using technologies in unique ways. If you never fall off a cliff and never have any hate spewed your way then you are likely a bland marketer who hasn't done very much.


Google is in the press almost every week, aiming to stretch the boundaries on trademark, copyright, privacy, and so on. I was lucky enough to chat with Larry one-to- one about his expectations for Google back in 2002. He laid out far-reaching views that had nothing to do with short-term revenue goals, but raised questions about how Google would anticipate the day sensors and memory became so cheap that individuals would record every moment of their lives. He wondered how Google could become like a better version of the RIAA - not just a mediator of digital music licensing - but a marketplace for fair distribution of all forms of digitized content. Google is seen as an amazing company that does a limitless amount of good for the world. Yet the are up for anti-trust review and carry ad categories for "get rich quick." Google massages how they are viewed. For a company that is so good at manipulating outside rules & guidelines, Top Source Media SEO they really lean hard on the arbitrary guidelines they create.